With so many online financial guidance tools available, from finance influencers to new AI tools, unregulated financial advice is now more difficult than ever to spot. At a time of ongoing financial turbulence, trusted and reliable sources are more important than ever when making key money decisions.
With this need for reliability in mind, are people actually taking the time to check the credibility of the advice they follow before acting on it?
To find out just how many Brits may be putting their finances at risk, credit card provider Zable surveyed 2,000 UK credit card holders to better understand how and where people are seeking financial advice in today’s increasingly complex digital landscape. This formed part of a wider study exploring the areas in which Brits are turning to non-regulated sources for financial guidance, including salary and wages and pensions.
You can view the full study here: https://zable.co.uk/money-academy/cost-of-bad-advice
Over two-thirds don’t check the risks involved before acting on financial advice
Key findings:
-
Shockingly, only 24% would check a financial professional’s credentials before following advice, and just 22% would investigate whether advice may be influenced by sponsorships, commissions, or conflicts of interest.
-
Despite growing access to incorrect financial information online, many consumers are failing to properly verify the guidance they receive before making financial decisions, with 68% not checking the risks involved before acting on financial advice.
-
Salary and wages ranked as the financial area in which Brits are most likely to seek unregulated advice, with over half (54%) admitting they turn to non-regulated sources for guidance on earnings and pay-related matters.
-
Arielle Rogers-Jenkins, Senior Product Manager (UK Credit Cards) at Zable, reveals what to do if you’ve been affected by bad financial advice and explains the steps you can take to limit any further impact.
Bad credit card advice has cost over 10 million cardholders money
New research from Zable reveals how unregulated financial advice sources are increasingly shaping important financial decisions.
-
83% of people are seeking financial guidance from non-regulated sources, with usage highest among younger generations, including 93% of 25-34 year olds.
-
Around one in 10 already use AI tools for financial advice; however, Zable’s internal testing found these tools consistently fell short when assessed for accuracy and relevance to UK consumers.
-
Over two-thirds (68%) of Brits don’t check the risks involved before acting on financial advice.
-
Nearly a third (29%) reported losing money due to poor advice relating to credit cards, while 28% said they had experienced financial losses linked to investing advice.
Managing finances has become increasingly complex, with many people navigating rising living costs and an ever-expanding range of advice sources, from traditional experts to social media creators and AI tools. But with so many places to turn, knowing which guidance to trust is not always straightforward.
New research from Zable, surveying 2,000 UK credit card holders, has revealed that the vast majority of UK consumers are now seeking financial guidance from non-regulated sources, with many failing to properly verify the information they receive before acting on it.
We also conducted our own assessment of the reliability of popular AI platforms when it comes to financial advice. Four major AI tools were assessed on the accuracy and relevance of the guidance they provided to UK consumers across a range of personal finance topics.
The majority of Brits (83%) are turning to unregulated sources of information for financial advice
More than four in five (83%) have sought financial advice from unregulated sources, from AI tools and social media platforms, to family and friends. Even in more complex financial areas such as investing, mortgages, and financial planning, a significant proportion of consumers are still relying on informal guidance rather than regulated professional support.
|
Financial Area |
% Seeking Unregulated Advice |
|
Salary and Wages |
54% |
|
Savings |
49% |
|
Insurance (e.g. life, health, income protection) |
48% |
|
Monthly budgeting |
48% |
|
Pensions |
48% |
|
Credit Cards |
46% |
|
Investing |
45% |
|
Financial Planning |
43% |
|
Renting v Buying property |
43% |
|
Wills and trusts |
40% |
|
Taxes |
38% |
|
Personal Loans |
37% |
|
Mortgages |
36% |
|
Debt repayment strategies |
35% |
|
Debt Consolidation |
33% |
The findings also revealed a strong generational trend. Younger adults were significantly more likely to seek unregulated financial advice, with 93% of 25-34 year olds and 92% of 35-44 year olds reporting they had done so.
These age groups are often navigating major financial milestones, including buying property, building savings, managing debt, and planning for families, making them more likely to seek accessible and immediate guidance online.
One in 10 are turning to AI for financial advice, but their reliability for UK consumers is questionable.
With around one in 10 credit card holders already using AI tools for financial advice across areas such as budgeting, investing, and insurance, Zable put their reliability to the test, asking four major AI tools – Gemini, Grok, ChatGPT, and Claude – common personal finance questions before awarding their responses either a pass or fail mark.
The results were weak across the board, with most tools defaulting to US-focused advice, including references to 401(k)s, FDIC insurance, and American savings guidance that does not apply to UK consumers.
Claude performed best overall with six passes, although some responses still included outdated UK information. Grok performed the worst, failing all nine questions, while ChatGPT achieved two passes and Gemini three.
Over two-thirds won’t check the risks involved before acting on financial advice.
Despite growing access to financial information online, many consumers are failing to properly verify the guidance they receive before making financial decisions, with 68% not checking the risks involved before acting on financial advice.
Shockingly, only 24% would check a financial professional’s credentials before following advice, and just 22% would investigate whether advice may be influenced by sponsorships, commissions, or conflicts of interest. With the growing influence of online “finfluencers”, particularly on platforms such as TikTok, where complex financial topics are often simplified, this lack of scrutiny leaves many consumers vulnerable to misleading or incomplete advice.
Poor financial advice is reportedly costing Brits hundreds of pounds per year, with almost a third reporting losses from bad advice in relation to credit cards and investing.
Almost a third (29%) of credit card holders, equivalent to over 10 million people, said they had lost money through bad advice given in relation to credit cards, with 21% (nearly 7.5 million) reporting losses of £100 or more in the past 12 months. This suggests that when things go wrong in these areas, the financial impact can quickly escalate beyond smaller, incidental losses.
Mortgage-related advice carried even greater financial consequences, with the most common reported loss range being £500-£1,000, reflecting the higher stakes involved in property-related decisions.
With so many sources of financial guidance now available, from social media creators to AI tools, it can be difficult to know where to turn for reliable advice. Arielle Rogers-Jenkins, Senior Product Manager (UK Credit Cards) at Zable says:
“When searching for financial advice, starting with regulated or official sources such as financial advisers, banks, building societies, and government-backed guidance services is key, as these organisations are held to specific standards and accountability in the UK.
“For those making more complex decisions around investing, mortgages, pensions, or long-term financial planning, speaking to a qualified financial adviser can help ensure advice is tailored to individual circumstances. Consumers can also verify that advisers are authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) through the FCA Register and confirm businesses are legitimately registered through Companies House.
“While AI tools, forums, podcasts, YouTube videos, and social media can be useful for building financial understanding, this type of content is often generalised and should always be researched further before acting on the advice. A lot of advice online, particularly on social media, could be linked to sponsorships, commissions, or product promotions, so it’s important to seek clarification and avoid making financial decisions under pressure.”
Methodology:
This report is based on a survey of 2,001 UK credit card holders, conducted to understand how people access, use, and evaluate financial advice.
All percentage figures are based on survey responses unless otherwise stated. Monetary values represent self-reported costs among respondents who indicated they had received bad advice in each area.
Zable also analyzed four AI tools – Gemini, Grok, ChatGPT, and Claude – testing their reliability when it comes to financial advice. We asked them nine common personal finance questions covering financial planning, investing, and insurance topics. Using their internal expertise, Zable then assessed each response for accuracy and relevance to a UK audience, awarding either a pass or fail mark.
The post A worrying 76% of Brits trust financial advice on social media without verifying credentials appeared first on USNewsRank.
Discover more from USNewsRank
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.