Man told to ‘tear down’ the Berlin wall he installed in London garden

A council has told a homeowner he will likely have to tear down the chunk of Berlin Wall in his garden – because it is ‘oppressive’.

Steven Thorpe, 65, bought a section of the famous wall from a farmer in Germany and installed it at his home in Herne Hill earlier this year.

But neighbors, annoyed they could see the top over their fence, complained to Southwark Council, who have now said the ‘only option available is a planning enforcement notice.’

A letter written by a planning case officer, dated July 2 and received by Mr Thorpe on July 4, says he considers the installation of the wall to be ‘unacceptable’.

The 3.6-meter portion of the wall, which weighs more than two tons, also exceeds the 2-meter height limit for ‘gates, fences, walls or other means of enclosure’ under planning regulations.’

And it goes on to say that the planning enforcement notice ‘is likely to require the removal of the works’. If Mr Thorpe does not comply, he could face a fine of up to £20,000.

Mr Thorpe, a property developer, says he’s going to appeal the case officer’s decision and disputes the measurements quoted.

He said: ‘I totally disagree with that – they’ve described a large reinforced concrete structure rather than a heritage artefact or sculpture.

‘I think that framing’s important, it underpins their conclusion simply as an unauthorised structure, when I consider it to be a historical artefact.’

The letter, however, said that the wall is ‘causing material harm to the amenity of the neighboring property by reason of its overbearing scale, oppressive sense of enclosure and stark industrial appearance that is made worse here due to the massive scale and unnecessary siting of the wall so close to the garden boundary.’

Mr Thorpe added: ‘They’ve relied on the fact it’s 3.6 meters high, it’s not – its installed height is 3.1 meters. It’s ‘within 60cm of the boundary’ – well, it’s not, it’s 97cm from the boundary. ‘It exceeds the 2-meter height for fences and walls’, well, it’s not a wall, it’s an artefact.

‘It’s not enclosing any land, it’s a free-standing, historic artefact. There’s no explanation whatsoever of the alleged planning harm.

‘My neighbor can barely see the top of it now I’ve got Red Robin [a shrub] planted along the fence. They simply assert it causes planning harm without any backup. One would have thought they’d come to visit the site before sending this letter.’

Towards the conclusion of the letter, the planning officer says an application may be accepted if it were moved elsewhere in the garden, ‘combined with evidence of neighbor consultation.’

But it continues: ‘However, absent any alternative proposals, the only option available to the local planning authority is to issue a planning enforcement notice.

‘A planning enforcement notice is subject to a right of appeal, including the right to request planning permission. However, you are also advised that failure to comply with the terms of the planning enforcement notice is a criminal offense, punishable by a fine of up to £20,000.’

Mr Thorpe said: ‘If I really have to move it, I’ll move it, but I don’t consider it’s doing any harm to my neighbor. They can barely see it now the screening is there with the Red Robin. I’m taking some advice from friends of mine in planning.’

Southwark Council said: ‘We have received a planning complaint about a section of wall installed in Dulwich. We will investigate the complaint and take any appropriate action in line with the national planning process.’

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@usnewsrank.com.

For more stories like this, check our news page.